Are you tracking agent views on your docs?
AI agents already outnumber human visitors to your docs — now you can track them.
If fintech does it’s job correctly, maybe one day we can all live in a house like this.
Something kept coming up in the margins of every conversation I had this week, so I want to get into it now.
Is fintech actually solving homeownership, or just building nicer packaging around the same broken system?
I've been sitting with this question since I wrote about Foyer for Forbes last week. The more I dug in, the more I realized the answer is genuinely complicated. Here's where I landed.
I'm really passionate about old homes. Not just owning them — saving them.
The ones with good bones that most people overlook. The ones with history no new build can replicate.
My story was featured in Business Insider and even after that, the gaps I still see are glaring.
My thoughts below.
💡 5 things I’m thinking about in tech for homeownership
1. The most interesting innovation isn't capital. It's structure.
Foyer embedding home savings into a benefits platform is not a revolutionary financial product. It's a behavioral one. Auto-contributions, employer matching, a clear timeline: this is the same mechanism that made 401(k)s work. People don't save for homes the way they save for retirement because no one ever built the scaffolding. Foyer is building it. That's the actual insight, and it's more durable than any particular feature.
2. The workplace is becoming the new distribution layer for financial life.
This is the part that doesn't get enough credit. Foyer’s platform already sits inside the moment employees make major financial decisions: health coverage, retirement, HSAs. Sliding homeownership into that same interface isn't just convenient. It catches people at the exact moment they're in the mindset to think about the future. Distribution built into existing behavior is a moat.
A lot of fintech companies learn this the hard way (I’m looking at you - Stairs Financial).
3. None of this fixes supply, and that's a real ceiling.
Better savings tools, smarter underwriting, AI-powered buying agents: none of it changes the fact that there aren't enough homes.
Fintech is working the demand side of a supply-constrained market. It can shorten timelines, improve preparedness, and help people make better decisions with the money they have. It cannot bring prices down at scale.
The companies that will matter are the ones honest about that ceiling rather than pretending it doesn't exist.
4. Transaction costs are a bigger barrier than most people admit.
Startups attacking the 5-6% agent commission, like Ridley, are more quietly disruptive than the flashier access plays. Saving for a down payment is one mountain. Then you get there and pay tens of thousands in fees just to transact. Lowering what it costs to enter and exit the market is as important as getting people to the door. This is an unsexy problem, which is exactly why it's under-built.
And it goes deeper than commissions. I tried to buy a $1 home recently. Yes, one dollar. The bank I wanted to use to finance the repairs wouldn't lend on it. So even if you can technically acquire a property, you still have no clear path to financing repairs, which in a distressed home can run six figures. The transaction cost problem and the financing gap are the same problem wearing different clothes. Fintech has barely touched this.
5. Transaction costs are a bigger barrier than most people admit.
For a long time, fintech defaulted to high earners and dual-income households: people who already had the most options. The data coming out of Foyer is interesting on this. 70% of their members are women, and single women are now the fastest-growing homebuyer segment nationally. That's not accidental. It reflects a deliberate choice about who the product is for.
But my $1 home experience is a reminder that the people who need this most, buyers trying to enter the most distressed, most affordable tier of the market, are still largely unserved. You can have the best savings tool in the world and still hit a wall the moment conventional lending won't follow you there. That shift in user focus is real progress. It's just not finished.
💼Work With Bear and the Bull
If you want to get in front of an engaged audience of founders, operators, and investors, I'd love to hear from you.
Bear and the Bull is at 1,100+ subscribers, 60% open rate, and 5% CTR - well above industry averages. 2/3 of readers are in fintech, 40% are founders. These are decision-makers who actually read.
Sponsorship opportunities include newsletter placements, podcast features on Money Memories, and integrated editorial arcs. Review the media kit here. For pricing, respond to this email.
Your eyes aren’t deceiving you - it’s my first ever video recording for Money Memories!
🎙Content Recap
✍🏽 I can’t keep up with what I’ve written on Forbes. But I’m officially in the top 1% of global contributors.
🎧 This week on Money Memories, I’m speaking with the founders of the New Orleans-based group mental wellness platform Cabana. This is the first in a 3-part series of conversations I recorded on-site at the 3rd Coast Venture Summit.
🔗 Other Interesting Reads & Listens
📌How Aging Home Inventory Is Creating A Tipping Point In Real Estate The WSJ wrote about this exact topic this week, and I actually covered it a year ago. Thought it was worth highlighting again!
If you find this valuable, here are a few ways to support Bear and the Bull (most of which are free):
📧 Share this email with 2 friends
💎 Become a paid subscriber
👇 Click on the link below
Till next week,
Ilona
Your AI is resolving tickets. Is it keeping customers?
Resolution rates look great. But Gladly's 2026 Customer Expectations Report reveals the metric most CIOs are missing — and what the data says about where AI investments actually translate into retention, not just throughput.